Presentation by Dr. Luba Racanska*, St. John's University
in response to H.E. Archbishop Diarmuid Martin
at the Holy See Side Event: "Development, the New Name for Peace"
on the occasion of the
40TH ANNIVERSARY OF POPE PAUL VI’S ENCYCLICAL
ON THE DEVELOPMENT PEOPLES POPULORUM PROGRESSIO
United Nations, New York,
17th October 2007
POPULORUM PROGRESSIO DISCUSSES 3 MAJOR DUTIES:
• MUTUAL SOLIDARITY—RICHER NATIONS MUST GIVE TO POOR
• SOCIAL JUSTICE—RECTIFICATION OF TRADE RELATIONS BETWEEN STRONG AND WEAK
NATIONS
• UNIVERSAL CHARITY—BUILD MORE HUMANE WORLD COMMUNITY
POPULORUM PROGRESSIO CALLS FOR FOUR IMPORTANT RESPONSES TO NEEDS IN ORDER TO
BRING ABOUT CIVIL PROGRESS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT—THE ONLY ROAD TO PEACE
1. REGIONAL MUTUAL AID AGREEMENTS AMONG POORER NATIONS
2. BROAD BASED PROGRAMS OF SUPPORT
3. MAJOR ALLIANCES BETWEEN NATIONS TO COORDINATE ACTIVITIES
4. PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS PROMOTING DEVELOPMENT
This important document provides a blueprint for all to follow in order to
create peace through solidarity between rich and poor nations. Today I will
limit myself to mentioning one initiative—the Millennium Development Goals—and
discuss in greater detail a second important development initiative referred
to as the “Emerging Donors” program for development. This second initiative
belongs to the new member states of the European Union. Both initiatives show
us that there are broad based programs of support for poor or poorer nations
heeding POPULORUM PROGRESSIO’S call as indicated in point #2 above. Some,
however small, progress has been made and major alliances formed between
nations to coordinate development activities (See point #3 above.).
The Millennium Development goals are known as an important initiative in
development with its main goal to halve the number of people living in extreme
poverty by 2015. The eight important goals include increasing primary
education, promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment, reducing child
and maternal mortality, as well as combating HIV/AIDS and ensuring
environmental sustainability. These important and defined goals of human
development are underpinned by the commitment of advanced, rich nations to
build a global partnership for development that includes a compact between
rich and poor nations aimed at reducing poverty around the globe. A great deal
can be said about the Millennium Development Goals but I am going to mainly
concentrate on the second initiative—the Global Partnership for Development
underpinning these goals.
I will highlight the countries in Eastern Europe and their development needs
and plans as I study this region so I am familiar with this example. The new
members of the European Union have recently started to contribute to
development cooperation as donor countries. This is a significant step because
these new EU members were recipients of international development funds after
the collapse of communism in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Thus, by
transferring expertise within and beyond Central/East Europe, these new donors
can help the global community to achieve many of the development goals, which
require increasing official development assistance flow for developing
countries. At this time, the “Emerging Donors” have a special focus on South
East Europe (SEE) and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). Clearly,
these new donors, who only recently benefited from development aid, can be
role models of transition for states to follow their example.
The experience of the “Emerging Donors” is especially important for the South
East Europe region that was beleaguered with military, economic, and political
crises and conflicts including the pyramid schemes in Albania, the Kosovo and
Macedonian conflicts, and the serious debt burdens. The SEE region refers to
Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia, Moldova, Romania and Serbia and Montenegro. According
to the most recent World Bank Assessment, all the countries of South East
Europe are characterized by low incomes and a high incidence of
poverty—especially in relation to the poorest countries to join the European
Union in the past. The extent of poverty in the region is about 20% with a
high of 45% in Moldova. The SEE is a diverse region of Slavs and non-Slavs
with an average income per capita raging from US$ 720 in Moldova to US$6,820
in Croatia indicating that poverty level varies from country to country. Most
importantly, transition and conflict left the region with a legacy of
inadequate growth and declining standards.
The role of the “Emerging Donors” in South East Europe is therefore an
important example of regional cooperation to enhance reconstruction and
development in SEE. Thus, as POPULORUM PROGRESSIO stressed 40 years ago
regional mutual aid agreements and major alliances among nations to coordinate
activities is a cornerstone strategy for development.
* Luba Racanska is an Associate Professor of Government and Politics and Department Chair at St. John’s University in Queens, NY and Rome, Italy. Dr. Racanska earned a Batchelor’s Degree in Russian and East European Studies from Yale University and a Masters and Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Before joining the faculty at St. John’s, she served as a post-Doctoral Fellow at the Research Triangle Institute in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Dr. Racanska research interests are ethno-nationalism in post-Soviet Republics, Russian foreign policy, and democratization in East and Central Europe. Her latest article, “The Role of the Nonprofit Sector Amid Political Change: Contrasting Approaches to Slovakian Civil Society” was supported by a grant from the Pew Foundation. She is on the editorial board of “Polity and Politics”, serves as Vice President of the Northeastern Political Science Association and is the recipient of several teaching awards.
